Friday, March 4, 2011

[gita-talk] Re: Are we Giving Importance to what we know to be TRUE? Your Insights Please !


Shree Hari Ram Ram

In recent "SADHAKA DAILY MESSAGES" Swamiji has addressed giving importance to
what we know to be TRUE....
Are we utilizing what we know to be true? Have we understood the term
"perishable" (naashvaan). Do we know ourselves as imperishable? Do we know that
the imperishable cannot be gratified by the perishable?
Are we getting trapped? Are we being stupid? Are we cheating ourselves? Do we
know / understand that it is only on realizing the Eternal, Imperishable
Paramatma that we will be satisfied?

Your INSIGHTS please !!!
Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram


Ram Ram
It is written in one of Swamiji's books

(Swami Ramsukhdasji ki ek pustak me leekha hai.)


Now it is everyone's experience that the body, mind, intellect are constantly changing, therefore they are separate from us

(ab ye to sabko anubhav hai hi ki sharir,man,budhi sab badlte hi rahte we apne se alaga hai.)

There is one point and that is that which is changing that we are surely experiencing, however or "self" which is unchanging, we cannot see. We cannot experience. In one of Swamiji's lectures he says, that our "self" will never be seen. It can only be experienced (anubhav) or understand. While explaining this Swamiji has said, that he who is unchanging can only experience the changing. This point I keep in mind the westerners on this forum, and write from the perspective of "theory of relativity"

(yaha ek baat hai ki badlnewale ka to theek-theek anubhav hota hai .lekin apna swarup jo nahi badlta hai..wo nahi deekhta..uska anubhav nahi Swamiji ke ek pravachan me suna tha ki apna swarup to kabhi nahi deekhega. uska to anubhav hi kiya jaa sakta hai, ya samajha jaa sakta hai..Swamiji ne is baat ko samjhate hue kaha ki "nahi badlnewale ko hi badlav ka anubhav hota hai". is baat ko mai is group pe westerners ko dhyan me rakhte hue "theory of relativity" se leekhta hu.)

Suppose"I" and "You" both are going to somewhere in Train with velocity say 4m/s. We both are moving but still "I" feel that you are in rest .same from your side too. However we know from our perception that we are moving but we don't feel so. Rather we feel that the outsides tree are moving behind with velocity 4m/s. ...Why "I" don't feel "YOU" are moving because "I" am also moving with same velocity. In the same manner we feel we are in rest on our chair in our room. but actually we are moving, as Earth is revolving around Sun. Again Why "We" don't feel that "We" are moving? because "we" also moving with same angular velocity with Earth around Sun.(However this explanation is not totally true according to depth of science I am saying this very roughly)....It Means that We feel "our "Mind" is changing, or our "Body" is tells that something is not changing and Who which don't change is our "SELF" and actually feels this change. If everything is changing then we cannot "perceive the CHANGE."

Now from this point it is clear that what we want to experience, that experience is there from the beginning. Many think that once we get knowledge of the essential truths "tattvagyaan" then we will see the "self" . we will see some sort of illumination. It s possible that such things can be seen, but whatever it is that will be seen, you are NOT THAT. This is a very solid and real point. rather what you will see in only that which will be changing. And that which is unchanging, will be the observer and the experiencer.

(Ab is baat se yah clear ho jata hai ki apne ko to jo anubhav karna hai wo anubhav to pahle se hi hai....bahut log sochte hai ki jab tatvygyan hoga to apni atma deekhegi...ek praksh jaisa deekhega etc. to ho sakta hai deekhe!!...lekin jo kuch bhi deekhega wo aap nahi ho!! pakki baat hai..balki kuch badlnewala hi deekhega..aur jo nahi badlta hai wo dekhega(viewer) ya anubhav karega.)

Then where is the difference between you nad the saints? We too haveknowledge of Truth. The difference merely is in that they give importance to these points. They value and respect these points. And we do not give importance to them. That is the only difference.

(Fir apne aur santo me anter kaha hai?...fir to apne ko bhi tatvygayan hai ?....anter sirf itna hai ki we is baat ka aadar karta hai..aur hum aadar nahi karte...sirf itna hi anter hai..)

"Are we Giving Importance to what we know to be TRUE?"
If we give importance to these points then we have experiential knowledge (tattvagyaan ka anubhav). And if we do not, then we are ignorant.

(yadi hum importance dete hai to tatvygyan ka anubhav hai...aur nahi dete hai  to agyan hai).


and one thing more with moderator. I saw your last topic "how to overcome sexual thought?" I surprise that the last msg was totally disappointing. someone tell that even Lord Shiva failed then how can we succeed? this is totally wrong interpretation. How can this message is the ending message os any topic?. A very good lecture of Swami Ramsukhdasji is available in this regard where someone argued with Swamiji that even in Ramcharitmanas it tells that to overcome flaws is very difficult. then Swamiji totally disagreed with him. Swamiji said "the reason the sins and flaws are expressed as insurmountable, so that man remains ever alert!" " shastro me dosho ko prabal isliye bataya gaya hai ki manushya hardam "SAVDHAN RAHE !"....

This does not mean that we accept the flaws and faults in us, and beleive that it is very difficult to be saved from commiting sins. It is not the meaning at all. There are no sins in us "self". None what so ever."

(iska ye arth thori na hai ki hum apne me dosh sweekar kare..aur maan le ki dosho se bachna bahut muskil arth bilkul nahi hai.. Dosh hamare me nahi hai..nahi hai .. ")

I forget the date of that lecture ..But I hope u can understand the difference of thought..IF WE CONTINUOUSLY THINK THAT EVEN "VISHWAMITRA" AND "SHIVA" ETC FAILED THEN WE WILL SURELY FAIL ....NO DOUBT !...SO IT WAS NOT SUPPOSE TO BE LAST MSG WILL BE OF THIS TYPE...thank you !...Ram Ram
Prabhu Bhakt


Shree Hari Ram Ram
Thank you Prabhu Bhakt, we can certainly open the topic up, for any insights to be included by either you are anyone else.
Gita Talk Moderators, Ram Ram

Dear Sadhakas, Namaste!
Kuldeep KumarJi, you have said very well that there is nothing else but THAT Imperishable only! I, too, find excuses to play this same tune in all my postings, as I see it is the Most important message of BG, and Swamiji! Here it is one more time!
All perishables are ONE undivided Whole, Imperishable Existence-Awareness, seemingly seen as separate objects by thoughts and existing only in Mind!
The world is one WHOLE and seamless AWARENESS/Consciousness in our experiencing of it in the moment of perceptions!
Our perceptions in terms of hearing, seeing, smelling etc etc, gets conceived into different objects with names by our cognitive faculty (Mind-stuff), which is really MAYA Principle of Vasudeva! HE has no intention of fooling us though, as He also has built in clues to way Home! On the contrary, He allows us to play( Leela), until we get tired and return Home!
When we figure out Vasudeva's game plan by Realizing in some Human Birth, as Saints and Sages have done, we can either fully participate in it without any suffering by assuming more bodies to serve Him, or remain at Home if we so choose.
In any case IT IS HIM Imperishable Satta(SAT) appearing(Chit) as perishing but not really! This is just to tell us to be from attachments to Perishable to see them as ME, Vasudeva!

Pratap Bhatt


The truth is that we r self centered.We draw our inferences by considering ourselves the centre of universe while our entity compared is far far smaller than even a grain of sand in sahara desert.The universe is immense.Our evolution is the result of local environment and effect of other worlds upon it.Our body can achieve,accomplish what many gadgets can.(Bhautki Sankhyki concept).Lord Shiva and 64 yoginis suggest that probably we are a 64 bit machine.The greatest thing about this human machine is that despite being insignificant entity in this limitless universe,it has endeavoured to comprehend it and the process is going.


Coverage of Maya is so strong that even when we know what is right, when it comes to put in practice,we find tremeendous difficculties because of outside temptation and our weakness. Weakness does not go next day after we decide to walk on Dharmic Path. It requires sustained effort.Everybody cannot do this. However I find that once we take even a small step in the right direction, cosmic intelligence starts helping. 'Swalpam aapi asya Dharmasya,Trayete Mahato Bhayat. This is my experience.
Jayantilal Shah


Hari Om

Certainly Lord is not that idiot ...but Jeeva is !!! Amazing logics are invented by 'trickster/illussionist'. "Mind" (Thanks, Brother Mike...what a word: trickster ) !

Why does mind becomes 'hell bent' to prove imperishability in perishability? Poor fellow survives only on such tricks ! Mind can not, I repeat can not, come out of asat ..! Mind is more honest and faithful than Self. Self can, inspite of being imperishable, get itself positioned in perishable (become Prakruti-stha- situate in nature...)but mind never does such adultery ! Hence what can it do except dragging the Self to pay more attention to it than to that 'gem of an advisor' ...VIVEKA !!

Why does Jeeva takes the title of idiot ? Oh...Jeeva can not enjoy the perishable without considering it to be imperishable ...! It is a Law, Divine Sadhaks ... You can not take pleasure out of temporary UNLESS you consider that to be permanent !!! So enters that 'trickster' mind too does not want to move out of perishability ( in fact it can not) and hence it allurs / attracts/tempts idiot Jeeva by giving 'thoughts' of imperishability of perishables .. Physical to non physical,and like. Jeeva swayed by 'pleasures' forgets Viveka (discrimination) , forgets teachings of Holy Gita ( Gita starts by discriminating between body/soul; asat/sat; perishable/imperishable; temporary/permanent..deh/dehi; shareer/shareeri ...) ...And Jeeva thus becomes a helpless slave of worldly pleasures ..! To Jeeva then 'mind' appears genius ( My and that great friend of his...Viveka...falls into dormant zone !!

Hence Lord Krishna is not idiot, Divine Sadhaks ... He starts Gita with discrimination between perishable and imperishable ... It is Jeeva who actually is idiot ...playing in the hands of 'trickster' mind that Jeeva can hanker after perishable objects/matters/activities ..!!!

As Simple As That !!!

Jai Shree Krishna

Vyas N B


Parakeet behavior … consciousness, devotion and transcendence …

I am quite amused and humbled at the same time by the comments from our dear friend Notesh Otes. I am sure our intelligent friend is aware that such utterances can be made by only three entities in this world.

The first one is Bhagavadgita Itself and The Lord Himself. I truly acknowledge the comments made with all humility. I am truly humbled from this perspective. I am cognizant of the parrot within and am willing to look into the matter all my life. In fact Swamiji's message sounded the same as well to me ... "have you ever actually excercized your so-called knowhow onto your very behavior?" Till then, all the knowledge including the utterances such as consciousness, devotion and transcendence remain parakeetish repetetions.

The second is possibly a humble Sadhak who often addresses oneself as a second person to enable oneself to address oneself objectively. In that case, the self-observations made by the Sadhka is very well take as well. Every utterance made thereby is the whip taken by a serious Sadhak for self examination. I eagerly participate in such Yagnya where one attacks one's own ignorance against realizing what is truly meant and inertia against adapting oneself into the knowledge thereby. I truly thank Mr. Otes for facilitating that humility from his end to nurture my appreciation further.

But, I am amused with the potential of the third fellow uttering these words. I am sure, our seemingly wise friend is also aware of the third fellow who can and would most often utter the same way … "I am perfect! Poor fellows … ignorant stupid flock does not understand anything … etc." quoting very high sounding intellectual concepts ... as if the fellow has already transcended the barriers of ignorance and inertia. This fellow's only interest is to believe that it does not need to subject itself to any testemony or examination. It is a VERY CLEVER plan it creates around itself for ONLY ONE REASON - to escape from the very process uttered in the very high sounding words. If it can believe that it has ACHIEVED, it need not do give up any of its coveted treasure! That is exactly the caution that I see from Swamiji's alert ... "have you ever excercized your so called knowledge ever ... truthfully?!" It has trained itself this way - to overlord all the faculties. This fellow remains the biggest parakeet as it shows its fingers toward many other seemingly parakeetish existence around.

I hope and wish that our friend is not letting this third fellow speak here. Being so close to this fellow everyday I am quite clear of its ways. I am amused when I think of the words uttered as potentially from this third fellow. As this third fellow chuckles on the potential ignorance and impotence of the rest ... I often get amused to chuckle at its own cosmic ignorance and inertia.

I am sure to hope that our wise friend or any other fellow Sadhak including me is beware of this third fellow - THE EGO! ... and would do their best not to be smitten by this fellow's self-glorifying venom again and again … one has to be extra-cautious with this since it makes its venom look like ambrosia to its own gloat!

Truly all the best to Notesh Otes.


Naga Narayana.

Everything is perishable. Seeing this, recognising this automatically connects
us to imperishableness.
Imperishable is not like perishable. It is imperishableness. No idea as to
good-bad can be formed in relation to imperishableness.
Mind can not attain it as mind is bound by the law of contrast. When it sees
that it is helpless in coming out of contrast, it is relieved.Imperishableness
is recognised.
Y V Chawla


Hari Om

The message of Notesh Otes is bit harsh, not only on this Divine Forum but also
on teachings of Shrimad Bhagwad Gita. To my belief, a parrot like reader of Gita
is infinite times better than the non reader of Gita.

Reading Bhagwad Gita is not physical at all ! A sadhak ( striver/ reader of Gita
as sadhana included ..) is never body ..never manifest ...He is always
unmanifest ! In fact, those who do not read Gita or accept its teachings are in
Delhi's Jantar Mantar ..certainly not those who read it, study it and experience
its eternal teachings. Reading Gita, in fact, removes doubts, confusions and
conflicts, ...there is no question of it causing conflicts or confusions..!!
Rather, the connection with world and faulty acceptance etc cause conflicts and
confusions ..but never Shrimad Bhagvad whichever way you read it !

Three themes have been insisted upon 1 Consciousness 2 Devotion 3
Transcendence, with a claim that Gita teaches those themes ! At the outset, let
me state that the 'consciuosness' is not a part of 'any process' ! If at all it
is of some spiritual value, it is name of ' IS-NESS' ..but to denote that there
are better terms/words like 'Existence' (satta-matra) BHAAV (opposite of ABHAAV)
/ IS-NESS/ SAT/ imperishable / permanent /soul etc are employed in Gita...! Only
once in Gita , the word 'consciousness'. (chetana) has been used ... to merely
denote it as a part/modification of inert/insentient Prakruti ..Read BG 13: 6
...Chetana !! That is all Gita talks about the word 'Consciousness' !!!

Transcendence..yes you must ! But to transcend what? Actually to transcend
'thoughts' / mind . Now as per Gita what you call 'consciousness' is part of
Prakruti ...and you must 'transcend' Prakruti ( Read Gita : 14:19...Gunebhyasya
paramvetti; 15:18- I am beyond Nature) and hence you must transcend
'consciousness' (chetana)/ mind/thoughts as they are part/modification of
Prakruti...!! That is one meaning given by Gita. Non Gita readers may use this
word 'consciousness' to denote existence/is-ness ( Present) / soul/ Self BUT
then in that case it is not "Process" is the GOAL is the
'realization itself' of the same .. It is 'smriti' (18:73 )..rememembering a
forgotten existing Truth...changeless truth...AS IT IS Truth ! You can't link
then the 'consciousness' with 'thoughts' ! Of course, the IS-NESS / MERE
EXISTENCE is totally different than AWARENESS !! The most of so called pundits
of 'Consciousness' actually end up understanding it as AWARENESS ...and Gita
precisely calls this AWARENESS as CHETANA..inert/insentient ..a modification of
Prakruti !!! When you are not 'aware' then also you are Prakruti-stha (situate
in Prakruti) only ..example ..deep sleep state, faint state...! Hence awareness
(chetana) is 'relative' not absolute.

In any case, if you mean by 'consciousness' the soul / present/ self /mere
existence / bhava/ Is-ness/ Sat etc , then also how can the question of
'raising/elevating its level' arise ? If it means soul / self etc then it is NOT
subject to CHANGE. How can you change it by raising or lowering its level
/characteristics/ quality/standard/ position etc ?

Now come to thoughts ! "Thoughts", being output of an inert machine called
'mind' , can ONLY be about the physical ( world / matter+activity) ! Thoughts
can never be about the "Present", about what exists, about the absolute, about
in your words 'non-physical' ( God/ higher power) ...NEVER ! Actually, mind (and
hence thoughts) can either travel in "past" or in 'future' and both DO NOT EXIST
!!! 'Naught' (asat) is mind (thoughts) and in 'naught' ONLY mind ALWAYS remains
positioned ...Note this fact in your Gita diary for ever !! Mind can ONLY remain
'positioned' in Asat / Mithya / Inert/ non-existent zone ! Rightly so...because
it is part of ASAT / Non-existent creator of it viz Prakruti. That is why you
are taught in Gita to make mind equanimous ! Because on one hand it can not
reach Paramatma ( Sat / Present / Is-ness/ What exists ) while on other hand it
becomes disinterested in world (its subjects) because the Self has stopped
giving any recognition/respect to the 'world' ('physical' in your words) ! Hence
it falls into an optionless 'equanimous zone' ! That optionlessness of mind is
called 'silencing of mind' ... thoghtlessness... desirelessness .. equanimity
...!! Hence mind / thoughts get silenced because there is no 'desire in Self'
for the world ..and without the Self being interested, the mind receives no
commands to loiter in world. That mind , thoughtless mind is

Hence Gita does not teach you " to raise the level of mind/thoughts or
consciousness" as claimed by you ..rather it teaches you to transcend the very
affinity with them, to renounce them, to disconnect with them ! In reality, the
goal of every Yogi ( Sadhak) of Gita it Karma Yogi or Jnana Yogi or Bhakti
Yogi is : To reach to a 'thoughtless' /'mindless' state !!! SILENCE (
thoughtlessness / desirelessness/ doershipless ...) is the goal !

Jai Shree Krishna

Vyas N B


-Shree Hari-

Thomas Merton:

When we are reduced to our last extreme, there is no further evasion. The choice
is a terrible one. It is made in the heart of darkness, but with an intuition
that is unbearable in its angelic clarity: when we who have been destroyed and
seem to be in hell miraculously choose God! (NMI, 208).


628. The mind makes an aeon (appear as) a moment within, and brings a
moment to the nature of an aeon. Therefore, they consider the space-time order
as dependent on that (mind).

629. (The mind) causes this error consisting of the mental object having
destruction as its nature, which is only unreal and has the appearance of the
real, as a dream (causes) another dream (within it).

Bhagavad- Gita 6/14:
Firm in the vow of complete chastity and fearless, keeping himself perfectly
calm and with the mind held in restraint and fixed on Me, the vigilant Yogi
should sit absorbed in Me.

Thomas Merton (a Trappist monk), describes the realization re the mind as
described by Vaasishtha (628-629), and the shock of it, thus the only option is
to turn to God. You notice he used the word intuition not knowledge.

Now on the other hand, such reduction to the last extreme is not a problem to
the Yogi who follows the Guidance of Sri Krisna, you notice the word fearless ,
and the mind kept in restraint.

The mind is an illusionists, a trickster. True knowledge as apposed to
perceived knowledge is not found in the mind, it is beyond the mind.

Sacred books, leaned discourse, great sat gurus, can only guide you on the
journey to Truth. The 'Awareness', (true knowledge) is for the Self to find!

Om ... Shanti ...


Dear Holly Sadaks,

Everybody speaks of Perishable and Nonperishable. According to Science Matter or

can neither be created nor destroyed but, it would keep on changing its form
only. Therefore, nothing can be perishable in the real sense. Everything is

The TRUTH seems to be that EVERYTHING (VASUDEVA SERVAM) is Nonperishable.
Through the Maya of Vsudeva itself, Perishable is an eternal property of change
existing and injected into the Nonperishable, keeping as ever US (ignorant)
wondering while HISELF (Vsudeva) playing as Leela!!!

Otherwise PLEASE, may anybody tell me what was the basic idea of creating this
Perishable lie (like ME, YOU or even infinite Universes) at all to begin with?
In other words, why Lord (Vasudeva) created the trouble BY separating ATMA from
PARMATMA and force it later through hectic exercises of various Yoga to merge
back into PARMATMA???????????? Can my LORD be that idiot?? I do not think it

I am
(Kuldeep Kumar Kaul)


Hari Om

Problem is that we 'know' but we do not 'accept' ! In Hindi : HAM JAANATE HAIN

We know whatever rises, sets. We know who ever takes birth, dies! Who does not
know that? But still, if some near and dear dies, we grieve ! At the same time,
we do not grieve when in the evening the Sun sets. In the latter case,we 'know'
as well as 'accept' that the Sun sets in the evening. So we do not grieve. In
the former case, we 'know' one must die, but we do not 'accept' ..hence we
become sorrowful.

We 'know' smoking is bad, still we smoke. We 'know' telling lies is bad, still
we tell lies. We 'know' greed is bad, still we become swayed by greed. Why ? We
'know' but we do not 'accept' !

We know the nature of 'perishable' still we ' like to accept' the perishable to
be 'permanent' !! much trouble we take to justify our insistence of
somehow seeing permanency in temporary ... including even bringing Vasudev
Sarvam truth ... What do we not do to see what we 'know' is perishable but we do
not 'accept' to be perishable ? Amazing ...!!!

Hence we must re-visit our 'acceptances' ( beliefs/assumptions / affinities/
connections) ....!

Jai Shree Krishna

Vyas N B


Spiritual wisdom is that.....

All creation, perishable or not perishable, is for our happiness and
satisfaction......every little thing/situation/relationship in this world is for
our happiness.....We need to have that helicopter view to enjoy every moment....
Perishable is not to be worried about but understood in right perspective and to
be used as the invisible ladder for going up to that eternal happiness...

Understanding, experimenting, experiencing the wisdom of life is the doorway to
that bliss..... i.e. eternal is achieved only when our every moment is
established in that unconditional bright happiness (beyond happiness and

Remember, we all have that happy natural state (HNS) within us....... HNS is
that state of "Nothing" from where originate everything...
Strong understanding, awareness and experience, helps the ball rolling and
builds the conviction.....contemplation is the key...

Sushil Jain


until our last breath we ourselves and people around us feel and take us to
be present and never feel we are perishable and upto that time we are true
although wek now that ATMA is imperishable as said in sri Gitaji  nainam
chindanti shastrani----------------------

how then a person has to differentiate between perishable and non perishable .
what i feel from sri Gita ji karmanye dhivadhikaraste--------should be followed
for grihasth peapleÂ
jai shri krishna

Chaman nigam

Dear Gita-group,

Yes, everyone is giving too much importance to physical/maya
truth. All of you have nothing else to go by. You all are reading
Bhagwat-Gita like a parrot and you are not applying the teachings
of Bhagwat Gita on yourself. Bhagwat-Gita talks about consciousness,
devotion and transcendence. These three words will teach you
how to "transform your thoughts from physical-thoughts to non-
physical-thoughts (God, higher power, source). This process will
begin to find your "absolute"/non-physical truth.

You will have to raise the level of mind/consciousness, prayers/devotion
and this process will be beyond-physical/transcendence. Reading
Gita is all physical and you may not find your answers this way,
instead, you will find coflicts, confusions and you may go into
junter-munter of New Delhi as many people (of your group) have
been going there and getting lost.

Good Luck! Bye!

Notesh Otes

Dear Sadhakas, it is a great invitation to share our insights into what
Moderators and Nagaji have shred with us from Swamiji's Treasure!
We need to clearly see that anything known or unknown, including body-mind-sense
complex given to us which we call "I", is perceived by senses and subsequently
conceived by mind with a name. All such conceived(thought-of) objects of this
world are in mind which functions in time-space fabric only, and hence are
perishable in time! Check this out by contemplating upon it.
Now, That which conceives objects through body-mind-senses cannot ITSELF be
conceived as another object of this world, and hence is free of time-space
fabric and therefore, is necessarily Imperishable! Even as IT cannot be known as
another object, it is our experience that IT knows through us and therefore, IT
IS, and hence is ITS own proof, being Self-evident Existence we feel we ARE!
Knowing this Truth as our true nature, the Real "I" that I am, is crown Jewel
of discrimination (Vivek Chudamani)!
So, Swamiji is asking us to stand as our true Self, the only Truth of perishable
World! This will free us from all attachment to "me" and its created world!
Know also that perishable objects exist only on Imperishable Existence, just as
waves on ocean, snake on rope, jewelries on Gold!
It is IMPERISHABLE which is GOD, appearing as forms of perishable objects!
And ... when we understand this by contemplating on it, we say "Vasudev Sarvam"!
Pratap Bhatt

Dear Sadaks,
We know we are perishable, and we know that we not the body, but we are Aham
Bhramasmi, we know we are trapped, we know we are stupid and cheating ourselves,
and we know we want to escape from these. But then why we are not getting out of
Maya. Strictly speaking 90% of us are aware. But what prevents us from raising
to higher level? Only very very few realized the importance. We know Geetha and
Sri Krishna and Swamiji and his teachings. But we cannot put in practice- Why?
Judge, Police, Ministers, Govt Servants know that taking bribe is crime. Person
to person cheating we know that we accumulate sins. But we do them without fear-
Why? Sadaks find out this obstacle then it is easy to liberate.


What 'this specfic-named' person referred to by mistake as I do is what
(this) I am destined to do because of the properties/ Gunas imparted to this
particular stula-suksma-karan body mistakenlt referred to as I. This I will
cheat itself and ask why, will know that it is perishable within a very
short period of time and yet act as if that short period is infinite time,
This I is designed to act stupid, trapped in illusion even if this I comes
to know the Truth. All this is but natural and not amazing. That is one
Truth that this I also knows and need not bother. The real Truth is that
there is the Other I which is permanent, ceaseless, unperturbed by what the
perishable I's do and do not do. It is that Other I that this I is destined
to vanish in. Can the existence this other I be experienced even as this
perishable I functions in its own guna and illusion led existence. That is
the only important issue: going beyond the darkness of the perishable I to
enjoy the existence of the ceaseless I. Will this happen!
Basudeb Sen


To feel satisfied, seek satisfaction that any possession, relationship,

situation, idea is good, important, sacred, moral, right, beneficial and so

on apart from its use, is the psychological comfort to which the mind

Then is there nothing as good?

Everything has usage value and that is the only goodness of it.

Y V Chawla

Give Importance to what you Know to be True

Again, a wonderful teaching (rather a whip) from Swamiji with a precision of
"Whatever circumstances one has been placed in, consider those circumstances and
situations as best of all and utilize it well, then you will be benefited … Your
knowledge is not less, however, what you know you are not utilizing it well … If
you utilize this knowledge properly, then this knowledge that you have is
adequate for your benefit ... proper utilization of this knowledge is that, do
not get trapped in the circumstances that have presented themselves to you -
neither become elated or dejected in them."

1. There are two terms in Sanskrit - Rita and Satya. One means perceived truth
and the other the Absolute Truth. How anyone who cannot acknowledge perceived
truth ever can appreciate the Absolute Truth?
2. An individual IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ONE'S HAPPINESS … also the individual
is the only one who is authorised to change one's state of presence - happy or
3. Finally, one does not need anything other than oneself to make oneself happy.
If anything else is used to "bring" happiness in one's life, the thing that
apparently brought the pleasure is sure to perish … and so is the pleasure it
brought along.

The best is Swamiji's response to the questioner's apparent quest for more
knowledge - "Whatever you have knowledge about, are you utilizing that knowledge
properly?" What a wonderful whip any Saadhak need to savor all the time!!!
Quoting Swamiji from other texts, "Baavar bed bidush baavariyaa poti pustak
pandhaa …". Studies through even milleniums cannot bring the awareness, if we
are not willing to utilize the know how we are graced with as of now …

We often bring the so-called "nobility" and even "divinity" to escape from our
fundamental responsibility of being happy succumbing to our eternal hesitance to
exercize the only authority we ever have - to be happy.


Naga Narayana.


|| Shree Hari ||
Ram Ram

Give Importance to what you Know to be True

There is one very great point. Have mercy on me and please pay attention.
Whatever circumstances one has been placed in, consider those circumstances and
situations as best of all and utilize it well, then you will be benefited.
Whatever things you have received, you don't need any more things than that.
However much knowledge you have, you don't need to know any more than that. The
amount of strength that you have, you don't need any more than that. Paramatma
(God) can be realized simply by putting to proper use the strength, the
intellect, the abilities, the circumstances etc. that you have. This is the
absolute Truth and is the principle.

Your knowledge is not less, however, what you know you are not utilizing it
well. You do not give it importance - that is your limitation. The
circumstances that have been presented in front of you, will not remain like
this forever. This knowledge is not something that you know only slightly, you
know this completely and entirely. If you utilize this knowledge properly, then
this knowledge that you have is adequate for your benefit. It is not even
slightly deficient. The proper utilization of this knowledge is that, do not
get trapped in the circumstances that have presented themselves to you. Neither
become elated or dejected in them.

Questioner: We know this point, however the extent we desire to know, that
much knowledge we do not have.

Swamiji: Whatever you have knowledge about, are you utilizing that knowledge
properly? Those things that you know to be perishable, do you have desire to
attain it or not?

Questioner: Yes we do.

Swamiji: Then where have you understood the term "perishable"? In reality, if
you truly understood "perishable", then you would not desire to attain it. What
is the gain in attaining the perishable? Just like a wealthy man has money.
Without the money he would not be called wealthy, similarly this world has only
perishables and perishing things. That which is perishable how can it benefit
us, how can it be for our welfare?

You your "self" are not perishable, rather the body is perishable. That which
you have received is going to perish, but you the "self" will not perish.
Things were not there initially and will not be there later on. Rather even in
the present it is continuously moving towards destruction. You were there
initially and will remain even after. Your existence will remain at all times.
A question was put forth to me, that in the present how to gain knowledge of our
existence in the future? The answer to that is, that you are afraid to do bad
things and you are pleased when you do good deeds; because you are of the
sentiment that by doing evil deeds you will later on suffer, and by doing good
deeds, you will gain happiness in the future. This is proof that you have
accepted your existence in the future. If we do not accept our existence in the
future, then who will go to heaven? Who will go to hell? You will be
reincarnated? Who will be liberated? On attaining salvation, you will be
blissful or will the world be joyful? The point is that you will remain, and
the body and other things will not.

If you think carefully how can that which is eternal and imperishable attain
happiness from perishable? By saying that something is perishable it means, it
is nothing but destructible, besides being destructible and perishable, it has

"Ant tohi tajainge paamar tu ne tajai ab hi te."

That thing which is going to perish, utilize it but do not trust it. Do not
depend on it as your support, having the notion that this thing will gratify me,
that it will lead to my prosperity etc. Think deeply about this - By getting
those things that are currently not with you, how will you be gratified? How
will you prosper? That which is not there right now, will also not remain later
on in the future. It will break away, therefore how will it make you happy?
Who knows with certainty whether you get it or not? And even if you get it, then
too it will not remain, because that which is perishable and destructible will

The body etc. is perishable - this you know, but you do not believe it. In
other words, you do not give importance to that which you know to be true. If
you gave importance to what you know, then you would not depend on perishables.
You would not have any expectation or hope from these perishables. You would
not become happy on getting them or meeting them. You would not be saddened by
not getting or meeting them. You would not desire for them to remain forever
and forever. You would not worry about them perishing. On not attaining the
situations that you desire, you become unhappy. Then this unhappiness is
nothing but stupidity. It is only stupidity. To want to hold on to those
things and situations that will not remain, and later being saddened by their
departure - what else is all this besides stupidity? If some calamity comes to
us, some sorrow comes to us, than we think how will this go away? But in
reality, it is going away. Whether it is favorable situations or unfavorable
ones, they will not remain. That which comes, is of the nature to go away.

Sarve kshayaantaa nichayaah patanaantaah samuchryaah

sanyogaa viprayogontaa marayaantam cha jeevitam (Valmiki 2/105/16)

The end of all hoarding is utter annihilation. The end of all worldly
successes is a fall. The end of coming together is parting ways. The end of
life is death.

That which is going to part, how can one gain happiness on meeting it? What is
there to be unhappy by it's going away. Neither happiness remains, nor sorrow
remains. Only the self remains. If the one that remains (Self), becomes one
that which comes and goes, one that is happy and sad, then it is only it's own

It is only on attaining That which never perishes, and That which is present
right now, Paramatma, one will gain the kind of happiness that remains forever.
Besides Paramatma if you become satisfied with anything else, whether it is
respect, honor, fame, relaxation, money, family, prosperity etc., you will be

(to be continued)

From book in hindi "Acche Bano" and english "Be Good" by Swami Ramsukhdasji

Same message is available in HINDI - PLEASE VISIT:
Titled "Acche Bano" on 23nd February, 2011.

Recent Activity:
All past 3650+ messages are accessible and searchable at

24,500+ sadhakas

A list of all topics discussed in 2009 along with their links are at

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.



No comments: